Ben Bernanke

Do yourself a favor. Do not invite both Vladimir Putin and Ben Bernanke to your next dinner party. Choose one and only one. If social obligations demand that you invite both, please make sure they are seated at opposite ends of the table.

Russia is a barely more than a thugocracy, yet the head thug has a firmer grasp on economic reality than the head of the Federal Reserve:

In a speech before the of economic experts at the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Russian prime minister had the following to say: “Thank God, or unfortunately, we do not print a reserve currency but what are they doing? They are behaving like hooligans, switching on the printing press and tossing them around the whole world, forgetting their main obligations.”
What appears to have angered the former KGB spy is the end of QE2.

According to RIAN: “Putin’s comments came in the wake of the completion of the US’ quantitative easing (QE) 2 program on June 30, in which the Federal Reserve bought $600 billion worth of its Treasury bonds. The Fed’s first round of QE, which ended in March last year, amounted to less than half the size of QE2.” We can’t wait to hear what expletive Putin will usher once Bernanke launches QE3.

After the break-up of the USSR, Russia’s economy was smaller than South Korea’s and we were the world’s sole super power. Now we’re being lectured by a thug.

And we’re sad to say he’s right.

Source: Zero Hedge

{ 1 comment }

No matter what you think of Alan Greenspan and his policies, you have to admit that he exuded confidence. He seemed to be in complete control and gave the country a sense of confidence.

Unfortunately, the same cannot be said of his successor, Ben Bernanke. He has turned into Sgt. Schultz, plaintively wailing, “I know nothing!” when asked questions.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke told reporters Wednesday that the central bank had been caught off guard by recent signs of deterioration in the economy. And he said the troubles could continue into next year.

“We don’t have a precise read on why this slower pace of growth is persisting,” Bernanke said. He said the weak housing market and problems in the banking system might be “more persistent than we thought.”

[click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

Who better than Jim Rogers to know when the system is about the crash than a man whose interests are allied with the Grand Puppetmaster George Soros?

Rogers appeared on CNBC and had no good news:

“The debts that are in this country are skyrocketing,” (Rogers) said. “In the last three years the government has spent staggering amounts of money and the Federal Reserve is taking on staggering amounts of debt.

“When the problems arise next time…what are they going to do? They can’t quadruple the debt again. They cannot print that much more money. It’s gonna be worse the next time around.”

Rogers peers into his crystal ball and sees a very grim future for the world’s largest economy:

“The U.S. is the largest debtor nation in the history of the world,” he said. “The debts are going through the roof. Would you keep lending money to somebody who’s spending money and not doing anything about it? No you wouldn’t.”

The pound sterling lost 90% of its value when it was no longer the world’s reserve currency, he said, and the dollar will, too. In keeping with his philosophy he said he owns the U.S. dollar and is waiting for a rally. “If it doesn’t happen I’ll have to sell and take my losses.”

He called Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke a “disaster” who has “never been right about anything” since he’s been in Washington. “I hope he doesn’t come back with QE3 but that’s all he knows. The only thing he knows is to print money.”

He predicted that after the Fed ends its quantitative easing program, known as QE2, this month, it may come back under another name.

“They’re gonna bring it back because [Bernanke will] be terrified and Washington will be terrified,” he said. “There’s an election coming in November 2012. Washington’s gonna print more money.”

You’d think we’d be elated to find out that one of the world’s most successful investors agrees with us. But somehow it’s not working out that way.


Source: CNBC

{ 0 comments }

Rep. Ron Paul and Dan Gross discussed with Yahoo Finance’s Aaron Task, Bernanke’s Tuesday testimony and his subcommittee’s hearing. It shouldn’t surprise to anyone that longtime Fed critic Paul didn’t agree with Bernanke’s testimony, especially Bernanke’s claims that QE2 is working and that inflation isn’t a worry.

[click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

Peter Schiff tells the Fox Business Network host what the thinks of Ben Bernanke. In short, he says Bernanke is a liar. There is one thing for sure that I think we can all agree on that Bernanke is lying about: he says food and energy inflation is at just 1% a last year. I have a feeling that two of Ben’s chores do not include going to the supermarket or filling up car with gas?

[click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

As it currently stands, the Fed is assigned by law “to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.” The last two goals are really one, thus the term “dual mandate.” There is call now to remove the goal of promoting maximum employment, and turning it into a single mandate. But it sounds like that while we’re talking about removing one mandate, Fed Chairmain Ben Bernanke has already given himself a third one.

Listen to this exchange on CNBC, where Steve Liesman interviewed Mr. Bernanke, and you’ll see what I’m talking about:



If you didn’t catch what went on, read the take from John Mauldin, who describes the exchange well, in his commentary is taken from his free weekly newsletter, Comments from the Frontline, one to which I highly recommend you subscribe.

In a paper with Alan Blinder early last decade, Bernanke made the case for the Fed to target a specific inflation number, and the number that came to be accepted as his target was 2%. In his famous helicopter speech in late 2002, he assured us that inflation could not happen “here,” even if the short-term rate was zero, because the Fed would move out the yield curve by buying large amounts of medium-term bonds. This would have the effect of lowering yields all along the upper edge of the curve. This became known as quantitative easing. In Jackson Hole last summer, he made very clear his intention to launch a second round of liquidity-injecting quantitative easing (QE2). In that speech, in later speeches in the fall, and in op-ed pieces he said that such a program would lower rates.

Then a funny thing happened on the way to QE2: long-term rates began to rise all over the developed world. As Yogi Berra noted, “In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.” It’s got to be driving Fed types nuts to see the theory of QE, so lovingly advanced and believed in by so many economists, be relegated to the trash heap, along with so many other economic theories (like that of efficient markets). The market has a way of doing that.

So, Liesman asked Bernanke about one minute into the clip (link below) about the little snafu that, following QE2, both interest rates and commodity prices have risen. How can that be a success? Ben’s answer (paraphrased):

“We have seen the stock market go up and the small-cap stock indexes go up even more.”

Really? Is it the third mandate of the Fed now to foster a rising stock market? I wonder what the Fed’s target for the S&P is for the end of the year? That would be an interesting bit of information. Are we going to target other asset classes?

Understand, I am not against a rising stock market. But that is not the purview of the Fed. And certainly not a reason to add $600 billion to the balance sheet of the Fed when we clearly do not understand the consequences. If it looks like they’re making up the rules as they go along, it’s because they are.

The Chairman has no business worrying about the stock market, let alone trying to manipulate it. The power grab of the Federal Reserve is out of control, and we wish Ron Paul and the rest of the like-minded reformers in Washington God speed in stripping power from the Fed.

{ 0 comments }

Peter Schiff was on Fox Business News with anchor Lori Rothman, who covers mid-day market moves. In this interview he talks about the consequences of the debt situation we find ourselves in. Not a fan of Ben Bernanke, he says he is “a liar, incompetent, or both.” He ends by predicting that gold will go to $5,000 or higher.

Here’s a quote from the interview:

We’re going to default one way or the other. There are two ways we can default: we can just honestly do it by not paying, or we can print money and pay back our creditors with monopoly money which is probably more likely. Sometime in 2011, if we make it out of 2011, maybe in 2012, we’re going to have a crisis. You know, they didn’t have a crisis in Ireland last year — they still had all this debt — what happened was interest rates rose because the bond market got nervous. Well, the bond market is going to get nervous, they’re going to start to realize the position that they are in, that they are not going to get their money back, or that they are going to get paid in inflated dollars, and interest rates are going to rise sharply in the United States, that’s going to destroy the ability of the federal government to pay its bills, that’s going to crush U.S. homeowners who have mortgages, particularly adjustable rate mortgages, it’s going to crush people that have credit card debt, auto loans, student loans, our whole debt-financed economy, is going to come crumbling down the minute the cost of that debt service rises.

Oh, one more thing: Damn! That Lori Rothman is hot, hot, hot. And we think the cameraman thinks so too, the way he keeps coming back to the leg shot.

{ 1 comment }

Nassim Taleb has alot to say about Ben Bernanke. And none of it is good. Not good at all.

Among the trashing he gives Bernanke regarding Quantitative Easing, he says these two things about him:

  • He is risk-blind…for example, he deemed the situation before the financial crisis “the great moderation.”
  • He reminds him of Long Term Capital Management people: you have brilliant people with great academic records, and they blew up Wall Street.

He did not see the risks before, why do we listen to him now?

Taleb sees particularly uneasy in this video, as if he sees something bad coming quite soon. Watch it.

{ 0 comments }

Last week, in an announcement that must have sent shivers through Ben Bernanke, it was announced that Representative Ron Paul will chair the congressional subcommittee that oversees the Federal Reserve. And Benanke is in his sights. A couple years ago, I would have characterized this as David and Goliath struggle, with the victory going to Goliath. But times are different now, with the Fed held in low regard and high suspicion, and the words of Ron Paul increasingly given more respect as his once far-fetched views, as held by some, become more mainstream. With the winds of the Tea Party victories behind his back, Ron Paul, while not yet able to embark on his mission to “end the fed,” I’m certain will be able to begin his long sought after audit of the Fed. And we can’t wait.

Listen to his December 13, 2010 Straight Talk recording to hear what a man on a mission sounds like. Then pass it around to your friends.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqZYVCCNs_E

Transcript:

We Need a Full and Complete AUDIT of the Federal Reserve!

by Ron Paul

Since the announcement last week that I will chair the congressional subcommittee that oversees the Federal Reserve, the media response has been overwhelming. The groundswell of opposition to Fed actions among ordinary citizens is reflected not only in the rhetoric coming out of Capitol Hill, but also in the tremendous interest shown by the financial press. The demand for transparency is growing whether the political and financial establishment likes it or not. The Fed is losing its vaunted status as an institution that is somehow above politics and public scrutiny. Fed transparency will be the cornerstone of my efforts as Subcommittee Chairman.

Thanks to public pressure earlier this year Congress did pass legislation that requires the Fed to disclose some information about its bailout of select industries and companies following the 2008 financial crisis. So two weeks ago the Fed released data concerning more than $3 trillion worth of assistance it offered to banks through its bailout facilities. After revealing this data, however, we are left with many more questions about the Fed’s lending.

In the Term Securities Lending Facility the Fed was supposed to have loaned against AAA-rated securities. Yet over half of the collateral put up by banks who obtained loans had no listed credit rating. Should we assume that the Fed accepted absolute junk-rated securities as collateral for loans? Presumably these securities were so bad that they wouldn’t even publicize their credit rating! So why should our Central Bank, backed up by your taxes, accept such collateral? On another note, of the $1.25 trillion purchased by the Fed’s mortgage-backed securities purchase program, only $877 billion in purchases have been publicized. What happened to the remaining $400 billion?

These kinds of limited disclosures by the Fed only underscore the need for a full and complete audit of the Fed’s financial books. This audit should be done by an independent third party in the same manner that public companies are audited. The Fed should make public its balance sheet, income statement and — perhaps most importantly – its cashflow statement. It also should publicize the notes explaining those financial statements.

We seem to forget sometimes that Congress created the Fed. It is a government-created banking monopoly and its top decision makers are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. If the Fed does not perform satisfactorily in the eyes of these politicians and their constituents, the Chairman and Governors may not be renominated. In theory, Congress — since it has the authority to do so — could even go so far as to repeal the Federal Reserve Act altogether.

Obviously Congress is within its authority to audit an organization it created by statute, and it’s time it assumed this responsibility. With 320 members of Congress co-sponsoring my legislation to fully audit the Fed in the 111th Congress, my hope is that we can build on our broad bi-partisan coalition in 2011 and continue the push for greater Fed transparency going forward.

Thanks for calling. A new update is recorded at 888 322 1414 every Monday morning, and the written text can be found on my website at www.house.gov/paul under the heading “Texas Straight Talk”. Thanks for calling.

{ 0 comments }

If you think Ben Bernanke was nervous on 60 Minutes Sunday, just think how much he’ll enjoy facing off with the new chairman of the Domestic Monetary Policy subcommittee, a man who wants to abolish the very Federal Reserve Bernanke leads — representative Ron Paul.

Paul, in an interview last week, said he plans a slate of hearings on U.S. monetary policy and will restart his push for a full audit of the Fed’s functions. This, my friends, is going to make C-Span worth watching!

Here’s a recent 12-minute interview of Ron Paul by Russia Today (RT), where he covers quite a lot of ground, from the Fed to Sarah Palin, and everything in between.

{ 0 comments }

If We Didn’t Laugh, We’d Cry

by Mark on December 8, 2010 9:20 am · Comments/Link

Jon Stewart is just about the funniest guy on TV, and he nails Ben Bernanke in this hilarious routine.

{ 0 comments }

Ben Bernanke appeared on 60 Minutes this Sunday, and was asked how confident he is that he could control inflation. “100% certain” was his answer.

First of all, any official that says they are 100% certain about something should be fired. But aside from that, just how right has Bernanke been in the past? A post by Graham Summers in Zero Hedge today listed the seven major things Bernanke was 100% wrong about over the last five years.

  1. A housing bubble in the US
  2. A recession happening in the US
  3. The subprime crisis being contained
  4. The 2008 Crisis happening
  5. US housing bottoming
  6. A recovery occurring in the US economy
  7. Inflation hitting the US

Here’s a video made last year, that chronicles his many astonishingly clueless statements. It will leave you wondering why this man is the Fed Chairman.

{ 0 comments }

Bill Gross: Make Things, Not Paper

by Mark on December 1, 2010 10:50 am · Comments/Link

Bill Gross, PIMCOPimco’s Bill Gross has once again gone off on Ben Bernanke, along with the cowards in Washington, D.C., in his December Investment Outlook, in a letter appropriately titled Allentown. Scolding our politicians for playing games with paper, and tax and spending policy seems appropriate on a day that politicians are arguing about if the retirement age can be bumped up to 69 in 2075, a year that we’ll all be either Islamic or living forever in our cyborg bodies. The real issue, Gross says, is that the United States needs to make things again, good things. Not paper.

[Read the letter, Allentown...]

{ 0 comments }