Federal Reserve

Written by Morgan Kennedy.

I know that technically the Federal Reserve was established in 1913, making me more than a little premature in the anniversary department, but the way things have been going lately we may not have another year of life as we know it here in America so I wanted to share this message with you now. There is still time to pull ourselves out of the economic mess we are in, but the window of opportunity to maintain our way of life is rapidly closing here in America thanks to one institution in particular.

Most of us don’t know much about the series of banks that comprises the Federal Reserve, like the fact that the Federal Reserve is owned and controlled by private interests that have no allegiance to the United States. In essence the Fed is a supranational organization that operates outside of the scope of American politics as none of our political leaders have any control over the Federal Reserve.
[click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

Want to know why the American financial system is teetering on the edge of collapse? Want to know why American citizens tell poll after poll that they’ve lost confidence in the future? Want to know why we think this whole financial bailout stinks to high heaven?

Read this quick excerpt from Zero Hedge. WARNING: Prepare to have your blood boil:

[click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

I get asked about what I think about our economic system. Why me? I read the Wall Street Journal a couple times a week and I guess that makes me an expert in some people’s minds. I accept this heavy burden that has been thrust upon me and willingly offer up opinions. Like this one:

I think we are in trouble. Maybe not Depression-era trouble, but serious trouble all the same.

Our money system is based upon trust. As long as people trust that a buck will buy $1 worth of stuff, you have no inflation. However, the actual supply of money bears no relation to that trust.

It’s a lot like banking. Suppose you decide to set up a bank. You rent a building, buy a nice safe and a burglar alarm, hire a few cheerleaders who can count and make change, and throw some money in the safe. You’re in business. Now, people come in, you lend them the money you have in the safe, but they don’t take it out of the bank. Nope, they write a *check*. So, while that money’s just sitting there, you can loan it out to somebody else. They also write a check, and so you can keep on loaning out the same money time and again.

Is that unethical? Well, it has been going on for a long time and is part of accepted banking practices, so, by that measure, it is not. It isn’t as risky as it used to be — way back, the banks had a lot of people who used savings accounts, and would want to be able to withdraw their money in actual silver or gold. If the customers all got scared, they could withdraw all their savings, clean out your safe, and your bank would go under since you didn’t actually have all that money on hand.

[click to continue…]

{ 1 comment }

While the Federal Reserve insists there is no inflation, the cost to create a dollar bill as risen 50% in the last three years, due to the rising cost of cotton and linen. Printing the dollar has become so expensive now, the government is considering switching the dollar from paper to coin. Listen to Peter Schiff tell the ironic story.

H/T: Libertarian News

{ 0 comments }

The light bulb went on in California Congressman Tom Cambell’s head today. He’s just realized that The Fed is conducting a Ponzi scheme of the highest order. Here’s his letter on Treasury Bonds:

Treasury Bonds: I learned something last week. I learned that fully 40% of the over $9 trillion in Treasury debt currently outstanding to the public has a maturity of 3 years or less. Put another way, it means that we are rapidly approaching $4 trillion in U.S. debt that matures by 2014 or sooner. As I write this, the yield (interest rate paid) on a 2-year Treasury note is 0.645% or about 2/3 of one percent. The yield, at the same time, on a 10 year Treasury note is 3.4%, and on a 30 year is 4.55%. In bond parlance, this is called a “steep yield curve” where interest rates get much higher as you go farther out in time.

[Click here to read the rest...]

{ 0 comments }

Waiting for The Big Splatter

by Mark on February 18, 2011 8:31 am · Comments/Link

Gonzalo Lira has written a great story today on the state of the United States.  Not because it prevents any new facts about the ever-rising deficit and the inevitability of continued quantitative easing, but because it tells the story in such a clear way that anyone one can understand why we are not getting out of the mess we’re in. Go to Lira’s blog for whole article, but we just had to print his brilliant conclusion her:

The American people have thrown in the towel. They collectively realize that the shit is gonna hit the fan big time. So in this little window of time before The Big Splatter, everyone’s pretending that nothing’s wrong, everything’s fine—we’re doing hunky dory, couldn’t be better. Any bad news—like the monster deficit? Ignored, blatantly.

You know those gamblers in Vegas, who go there and blow their house on the black jack tables? And then they go around town buying hookers and blow left and right, partying hard until the dawn, acting as if they didn’t have a care in the world? At least until the night runs out?

That’s the United States.

The American people—collectively, irrespective of political parties—blew their country like a gambler blows his house on the black jack tables. Whether it was on unsustainable entitlement programs, or unwinnable (and illegal) (and pointless) wars, or foolishly short-sighted tax policies, or crony corruption, or demands for absurd services—it doesn’t matter, the result is the same:

The American people collectively blew their country. So now, everyone’s pretending that everything’s fine, while they wait for the shit to hit the fan.

Everybody with any sense knows that The Big Splatter is on its way—everyone knows there’s nothing that can stop it. So when bits of bad news crop up—like the revised deficit numbers—Americans are placid as Hindu cows.

And why not? These deficit numbers are nothing! Americans all know that it’s going to get much, much worse. They all know that there’s no sense worrying about the little milestones on the road to hell.

They all know that they’re waiting for The Big Splatter.

{ 0 comments }

Rep. Ron Paul and Dan Gross discussed with Yahoo Finance’s Aaron Task, Bernanke’s Tuesday testimony and his subcommittee’s hearing. It shouldn’t surprise to anyone that longtime Fed critic Paul didn’t agree with Bernanke’s testimony, especially Bernanke’s claims that QE2 is working and that inflation isn’t a worry.

[click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

Some working in the Federal Reserve have taken it upon themselves to attack Ron Paul, who is now in position to audit the Fed, and others who question the powers of the Fed.

Representative Paul fights back in this impassioned speech on the floor, taking the Fed to task for not anticipating the financial crisis, and for taking credit for rescuing the economy (not that it’s rescued) when they really only rescued the banks, not the American people.

Lawmakers like Ron Paul are unfortunately few, and are really the only hope to save the country. Support him and others who speak the turth, plainly, loudly, and over and over.

{ 0 comments }

How afraid is the Fed of Ron Paul? Scared shitless I’d say.

Ron Paul end the fed

Why in the world would the Fed be afraid of this man?

On Saturday, the Houston Chronicle ran an op-ed by Paul Hobby, who is chairman of the Houston Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. It’s called Hands off the fed, with the subtitle of “Eliminating U.S. ability to conduct monetary policy is a very bad idea.”

The article’s obvious target is Ron Paul, who will take the reins of the monetary policy subcommittee with oversight responsibility for the Fed. Why would this scare the Fed? Just the little bit about Paul only wanting not not only audit the Fed as soon as possible, but abolish the Fed eventually.

The sooner Ron Paul gets to work on this, the better.

[Click to read the op-ed...]

{ 0 comments }

As it currently stands, the Fed is assigned by law “to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.” The last two goals are really one, thus the term “dual mandate.” There is call now to remove the goal of promoting maximum employment, and turning it into a single mandate. But it sounds like that while we’re talking about removing one mandate, Fed Chairmain Ben Bernanke has already given himself a third one.

Listen to this exchange on CNBC, where Steve Liesman interviewed Mr. Bernanke, and you’ll see what I’m talking about:



If you didn’t catch what went on, read the take from John Mauldin, who describes the exchange well, in his commentary is taken from his free weekly newsletter, Comments from the Frontline, one to which I highly recommend you subscribe.

In a paper with Alan Blinder early last decade, Bernanke made the case for the Fed to target a specific inflation number, and the number that came to be accepted as his target was 2%. In his famous helicopter speech in late 2002, he assured us that inflation could not happen “here,” even if the short-term rate was zero, because the Fed would move out the yield curve by buying large amounts of medium-term bonds. This would have the effect of lowering yields all along the upper edge of the curve. This became known as quantitative easing. In Jackson Hole last summer, he made very clear his intention to launch a second round of liquidity-injecting quantitative easing (QE2). In that speech, in later speeches in the fall, and in op-ed pieces he said that such a program would lower rates.

Then a funny thing happened on the way to QE2: long-term rates began to rise all over the developed world. As Yogi Berra noted, “In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.” It’s got to be driving Fed types nuts to see the theory of QE, so lovingly advanced and believed in by so many economists, be relegated to the trash heap, along with so many other economic theories (like that of efficient markets). The market has a way of doing that.

So, Liesman asked Bernanke about one minute into the clip (link below) about the little snafu that, following QE2, both interest rates and commodity prices have risen. How can that be a success? Ben’s answer (paraphrased):

“We have seen the stock market go up and the small-cap stock indexes go up even more.”

Really? Is it the third mandate of the Fed now to foster a rising stock market? I wonder what the Fed’s target for the S&P is for the end of the year? That would be an interesting bit of information. Are we going to target other asset classes?

Understand, I am not against a rising stock market. But that is not the purview of the Fed. And certainly not a reason to add $600 billion to the balance sheet of the Fed when we clearly do not understand the consequences. If it looks like they’re making up the rules as they go along, it’s because they are.

The Chairman has no business worrying about the stock market, let alone trying to manipulate it. The power grab of the Federal Reserve is out of control, and we wish Ron Paul and the rest of the like-minded reformers in Washington God speed in stripping power from the Fed.

{ 0 comments }

Last week, in an announcement that must have sent shivers through Ben Bernanke, it was announced that Representative Ron Paul will chair the congressional subcommittee that oversees the Federal Reserve. And Benanke is in his sights. A couple years ago, I would have characterized this as David and Goliath struggle, with the victory going to Goliath. But times are different now, with the Fed held in low regard and high suspicion, and the words of Ron Paul increasingly given more respect as his once far-fetched views, as held by some, become more mainstream. With the winds of the Tea Party victories behind his back, Ron Paul, while not yet able to embark on his mission to “end the fed,” I’m certain will be able to begin his long sought after audit of the Fed. And we can’t wait.

Listen to his December 13, 2010 Straight Talk recording to hear what a man on a mission sounds like. Then pass it around to your friends.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqZYVCCNs_E

Transcript:

We Need a Full and Complete AUDIT of the Federal Reserve!

by Ron Paul

Since the announcement last week that I will chair the congressional subcommittee that oversees the Federal Reserve, the media response has been overwhelming. The groundswell of opposition to Fed actions among ordinary citizens is reflected not only in the rhetoric coming out of Capitol Hill, but also in the tremendous interest shown by the financial press. The demand for transparency is growing whether the political and financial establishment likes it or not. The Fed is losing its vaunted status as an institution that is somehow above politics and public scrutiny. Fed transparency will be the cornerstone of my efforts as Subcommittee Chairman.

Thanks to public pressure earlier this year Congress did pass legislation that requires the Fed to disclose some information about its bailout of select industries and companies following the 2008 financial crisis. So two weeks ago the Fed released data concerning more than $3 trillion worth of assistance it offered to banks through its bailout facilities. After revealing this data, however, we are left with many more questions about the Fed’s lending.

In the Term Securities Lending Facility the Fed was supposed to have loaned against AAA-rated securities. Yet over half of the collateral put up by banks who obtained loans had no listed credit rating. Should we assume that the Fed accepted absolute junk-rated securities as collateral for loans? Presumably these securities were so bad that they wouldn’t even publicize their credit rating! So why should our Central Bank, backed up by your taxes, accept such collateral? On another note, of the $1.25 trillion purchased by the Fed’s mortgage-backed securities purchase program, only $877 billion in purchases have been publicized. What happened to the remaining $400 billion?

These kinds of limited disclosures by the Fed only underscore the need for a full and complete audit of the Fed’s financial books. This audit should be done by an independent third party in the same manner that public companies are audited. The Fed should make public its balance sheet, income statement and — perhaps most importantly – its cashflow statement. It also should publicize the notes explaining those financial statements.

We seem to forget sometimes that Congress created the Fed. It is a government-created banking monopoly and its top decision makers are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. If the Fed does not perform satisfactorily in the eyes of these politicians and their constituents, the Chairman and Governors may not be renominated. In theory, Congress — since it has the authority to do so — could even go so far as to repeal the Federal Reserve Act altogether.

Obviously Congress is within its authority to audit an organization it created by statute, and it’s time it assumed this responsibility. With 320 members of Congress co-sponsoring my legislation to fully audit the Fed in the 111th Congress, my hope is that we can build on our broad bi-partisan coalition in 2011 and continue the push for greater Fed transparency going forward.

Thanks for calling. A new update is recorded at 888 322 1414 every Monday morning, and the written text can be found on my website at www.house.gov/paul under the heading “Texas Straight Talk”. Thanks for calling.

{ 0 comments }

If you think Ben Bernanke was nervous on 60 Minutes Sunday, just think how much he’ll enjoy facing off with the new chairman of the Domestic Monetary Policy subcommittee, a man who wants to abolish the very Federal Reserve Bernanke leads — representative Ron Paul.

Paul, in an interview last week, said he plans a slate of hearings on U.S. monetary policy and will restart his push for a full audit of the Fed’s functions. This, my friends, is going to make C-Span worth watching!

Here’s a recent 12-minute interview of Ron Paul by Russia Today (RT), where he covers quite a lot of ground, from the Fed to Sarah Palin, and everything in between.

{ 0 comments }

Jim Rogers says U.S. Inflation Data is B.S.

by Mark on December 9, 2010 7:07 am · Comments/Link

Jim Rogers was interviewed at the 2011 Investment Outlook Summit and among many other things he called the U.S. government inflation data “a sham.” Anyone that pays rent, buys groceries, goes out to dinner, and just about any other activity, knows that there is most definitely inflation. As Rogers says, “Everybody in this room knows prices are going up for everything.”

In this 30 minute interview, he comments on inflation, the Federal Reserve, rising interest rates, the Eurozone, commodities and other concerning world issues.

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Source: Reuters

{ 0 comments }

Nouriel Roubini: It’s Going to Get Worse

by Mark on December 7, 2010 7:05 am · Comments/Link

If you’re feeling good about the (expected) announcement of the renewal of the Bush tax cuts, wipe that silly optimism off your face and listen to Nouriel Roubini about the real state of the financial crisis — no, it’s didn’t go away — and how close we are to a new, and deep, recession.

Most think we’ve already seen the financial crisis and the resulting recession. But, Roubini says we’ve yet to see one of the worst recessions in decades and (still) the worst U.S. financial crisis since the Great Depression. At fault are the central bank, the fed, the treasury, who are all making major mistakes.

Things are going to get worse, he says, where Fannie and Freddie are insolvent, where hundreds of small banks are insolvent, where some regional banks go bankrupt and where even some of the national major banks are insolvent. And in a year or two there will not be any major independent broker-dealers left.

This is a major systemic financial crisis and there is no end to it. There is nothing that can be done at this point to save us.

Go to cash, he says. Period.

Have a good day.

{ 0 comments }

Financial analyst Chris Whalen, who monitors risk in the U.S. financial system, was on MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan show yesterday, commenting on the Federal Reserve’s release of where they spent the trillions of dollars to save the financial system. Much of the money went to financial institutions who give no thanks to the U.S. taxpayer now.

Whalen is the cofounder of Institutional Risk Analytics, the Torrance, CA, provider of bank and company ratings, custom analytics and consulting services for auditors, regulators and financial professionals. Christopher is the author of the new book, “Inflated: How Money and Debt Built the American Dream.”

{ 0 comments }