IMF

Max Keiser, in commenting on WSJ article, Portuguese Banks Face Downgrade ($), said:

The pattern is the same. The rating agencies downgrade. The bond assassins start selling sovereign debt with naked (counterfeit) short-sales. The politicians start talking austerity. The IMF is called in to steal the country’s assets. This organized crime racket has been active in Central and South America for decades (read John Perkins, “Confessions of an economic hit man”). And we’ve seen this technique used on Wall St. for just as long as one company targets another with a ‘leveraged buy out’ (buying another company by pledging the assets of the company being taken over as the basis for a loan big enough to swallow the company). Now we are seeing this in Western Europe and the folks in the U.S. who have been insulated from this predatory financial terrorism are getting a taste of it first hand. There is no end for the suicide bankers. They will continue like this until every economy they can find has been stripped and left for dead.

This quote ties in with the earlier post on Keiser’s comments on the IMF.

{ 0 comments }

Never a man to mince his words, Max Keiser lets loose on “terrorist organization” JP Morgan, on the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn.

{ 0 comments }

Ireland’s debt problems are not going to be contained by its borders, or even to the PIGS nations. The banks in France, Germany and particularly the United Kingdom have made large loans to Ireland, and when they default — not if, but when, says former IMF Executive Desmond Lachman — these banks will suffer huge losses.

Bank problems at the core of Europe would be bad for the Euro and good for the U.S. Dollar. And this is bad for American exports. And these exports that benefit from a weak dollar is what the U.S. stock market has largely been pinning its hopes on. And beyond this, of course, the U.S. financial system is part of the global financial system, and as we saw two years ago, everything is interconnected. If they go down hard, the U.S. will feel it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTBU3AsZwC4

{ 0 comments }

Understanding QE2 — and what could go wrong

by Mark on November 3, 2010 7:06 am · 5 comments

qe2 - quantitative easingThe fed is about to announce the size of their quantitative easing efforts. And it comes with great risk. I get asked a lot just what is QE2, and today I ran across an article that explains it very well in plain, layman’s language. Pass it along to any of your friends who need a clear understanding of what quantitative easing is, and what could go wrong with this desperate attempt to keep us from fiscal ruin.

The Federal Reserve is about to take a huge risk in hopes of getting the economy steaming along again. Nobody is sure it will work, and it may actually do damage.

The Fed is expected to announced today that it will buy $500 billion to $1 trillion in government debt, and drive already low long-term interest rates even lower. The central bank would buy the debt in chunks of $100 billion a month, probably starting immediately.

Economists call it “quantitative easing.” It gets the name “QE2″ — like the ship — because this would be the second round. The Fed spent about $1.7 trillion from 2008 to earlier this year to take bonds off the hands of banks and stabilize them.

Here’s how it’s supposed to work this time: The Fed buys Treasury bonds from banks, providing them cash to lend to customers. Buying so many bonds also lowers interest rates because demand for Treasurys leads to higher prices and lower yields. Interest rates are linked to yields. Lower rates encourage people to borrow money for a mortgage or another loan.

At the same time, lower interest rates make relatively safe investments like bonds and cash less appealing, so companies and investors take the cash and buy equipment or other investments, like stocks. The S&P 500 takes off and Americans celebrate with a shopping spree. Businesses see a rise in sales and begin hiring again, and a virtuous cycle of more spending and more hiring ensues.

But many analysts and even supporters of the plan see dangers. It could make the weak dollar even weaker and lead to trade disputes with other countries. It could lead bond traders to believe that higher inflation is on the way, and they could derail the Fed’s efforts by pushing rates higher. Many investors argue that it may create bubbles as hedge funds and other speculators borrow cheaply and make even bigger bets on stocks, commodities and markets in developing countries like Brazil.

“It’s a desperate act,” says Jeremy Grantham, co-founder of the investment firm GMO. Grantham says it’s a clear message from the Fed to the rest of the world: “The U.S. doesn’t care if the dollar weakens.”

Here is a look at the ways the Fed’s strategy could backfire:

Read the whole article here: AP

{ 5 comments }